1. I used to believe in the cant. I started checking it out because a good friend did not, even though he had no data to justify it. I set about finding data to prove the AGW theory to him.
2. I found a lot of conflicting information. I looked further. I wavered. I went back. I wavered again. A month of hard digging led me to the conclusion that it was an unsubstantiated theory at best, a hoax at worst.
3. I grew more and more frustrated an the misleading and erroneous claims of what AGW had done and would do. All the 'would do' scenarios were based on 'has done'. None of the 'has done' scenarios was without fault, and many (like sea levels) seem outright fraudulent.
4. Frustration grows, and disbelief grows ever stronger. The more I think and talk about it, the more tenuous it all seems. If even half of what was claimed was true, the AGW theory had no legs, and yet the media were screaming ever more shrilly. Now government were really, really trying to take my money to .... well, I'm not quite sure to do what. 'Fix' something (as if taxing anything ever 'fixed' anything but treasury coffers). I had no choice, and the money would plainly NOT be used in any effective way.
5. Someone lets the cat out of the bag and posted a huge chunk of CRU information and emails on the web. All the prominent scientists who have been tirelessly investigating this area and finding ever increasing fault with the 'science' have been proved correct. It is true, the evidence is in. The debate is over, and the books were cooked.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/#comment-228950
Steve McIntyre posted this on Climate Audit

6. Hopefully Copenhagen will be a cold and desolate place in December....
Only one thing left to say:
"Game over"
0 comments:
Post a Comment